| 1. |
RFID in Healthcare--A Whole Industry of Value ( Pages)
by Lucy West
Oct 20, 2004
Abstract : This article talks about recent and expected FDA regulations and how RFID can help meet those requirements while improving supply chain performance.
|
| 2. |
ERP − Distribution Showdown! Oracle's JD Edwards vs. TGI's Enterprise 21 ( Pages)
by Dylan Persaud
Jul 31, 2007
Abstract : Using our ERP - Distribution Evaluation Center, we compared Oracle's JD Edwards and Technology Group International head-on. For the overall rankings portion, we looked at these vendors' solutions in two basic configurations, with and without back-office (human resources [HR] and financials) functionality. To eliminate any chance of bias and to ensure a level playing field, all 3, 414 criteria comprising all the modules and submodules in the ERP - distribution request for information (RFI) were given equal weight and priority...
|
| 3. |
Merchandising Showdown! Lawson vs. Epicor/CRS vs. Aldata ( Pages)
by Christina Park
Jul 18, 2007
Abstract : Using our Merchandising Evaluation Center , we compared Lawson Software, Epicor, and Aldata Solution head-on. For the overall rankings portion, we looked at these vendor solutions in two basic configurations, with and without POS functionality. To eliminate any chance of bias, and to ensure a level playing field, all 3,072 criteria comprising all the modules and submodules in the merchandising request for information (RFI) were given equal weight and priority…
|
| 4. |
EAM Showdown! IFS vs. Mincom vs. CHAMPS ( Pages)
by Sadat Zaman
Apr 27, 2007
Abstract : Using our EAM Evaluation Center, we compared Mincom Ellipse, CHAMPS, and IFS head-on. For the overall rankings, we looked at the vendors in two basic configurations: with back-office (HR and financials) functionality, for a total of eight main modules, and without, for a total of six main modules. To eliminate any chance of bias, and to ensure a level playing field, all 3,146 criteria comprising the modules and submodules in the EAM request for information (RFI) were given equal weight and priority.
|
| 5. |
CRM Selections: When An Ounce Of Prevention Is Worth A Pound Of Cure Part Two: Using A Knowledge Base To Reduce The Time, Risk And Cost Of A CRM Selection ( Pages)
by Lou Talarico & Kevin Ramesan
Apr 19, 2003
Abstract : Using a knowledge base in the selection process can reduce the time, risk and cost of procuring technology. Well constructed knowledge bases that are used in a tested selection methodology reduce the RFI process from months to weeks, eliminate data quality issues and allow an apples to apples comparison of vendor offerings.
|
| 6. |
Facing A Selection? Try A Knowledge-Based Matchmaker Part 2: A Timesaving Solution ( Pages)
by P.J. Jakovljevic, Louie Talarico
Mar 6, 2002
Abstract : Since a 'one-size-fits-all' product is still not quite a viable possibility, almost every product can win provided a certain set of requirements. The Catch 22 for both buyers and vendors/VARs is to pinpoint the right opportunity in this ongoing 'dating game'. An RFP/RFI selection process can streamline the initial phase of an ERP selection process while addressing many of the buyer's vital questions.
|
| 7. |
Facing A Selection? Try A Knowledge-Based Matchmaker Part 1: Problem Overview ( Pages)
by P.J. Jakovljevic, Louie Talarico
Mar 5, 2002
Abstract : Since a 'one-size-fits-all' product is still not quite a viable possibility, almost every product can win provided a certain set of requirements. The Catch 22 for both buyers and vendors/VARs is to pinpoint the right opportunity in this ongoing 'dating game'. An RFP/RFI selection process can streamline the initial phase of an ERP selection process while addressing many of the buyer's vital questions.
|
| 8. |
Chemical Industry ERP Showdown: Infor vs. JD Edwards vs. Lawson vs. SAP vs. SSI ( Pages)
by Larry Blitz
Mar 10, 2008
Abstract : Today’s Showdown is based on an industry-specific case study. Five enterprise resource planning vendors were selected for the evaluation. All the results were based on the latest request for information (RFI) supplied to us by the vendors, and all priorities were assigned by the client.
|
| 9. |
Retail Merchandising Showdown! Lawson Software vs. Epicor vs. Aldata Solution ( Pages)
by TEC Analysts
Feb 15, 2008
Abstract : Using our Merchandising Evaluation Center, we compared Lawson Retail Operations Management, Epicor CRS Merchandising, and Aldata G.O.L.D. head on. For the overall rankings portion, we looked at these vendor solutions in two basic configurations: with and without POS functionality. To eliminate any chance of bias, and to ensure a level playing field, all 3,072 criteria comprising all the modules and submodules in the merchandising request for information (RFI) were given equal weight and priority…
|
CART 
