1. |
EAM/CMMS Evaluation Center

Nov 8, 2009
Today's usage of Decision Support Systems (DSS), combined with vetted EAM knowledge bases, allows organizations to save time and money, achieving better and more reliable/fully-documented decisions, a quantum improvement over the widely-used subjective process of selecting complex enterprise software...
|
| 2. |
EAM versus CMMS: What's Right for Your Company ( Pages)
by Joe Strub and P.J. Jakovljevic
Jun 20, 2008 Abstract : This article looks at where computerized maintenance management systems (CMMS) end and enterprise asset management (EAM) takes over, focusing on features and functionality of EAM software. It also compares CMMS and EAM software and explores the two key differentiators.
|
| 3. |
EAM versus CMMS: What's Right for Your Company (0 Pages)
by Joe Strub and P.J. Jakovljevic
Aug 24, 2009 Abstract : This article looks at where computerized maintenance management systems (CMMS) end and enterprise asset management (EAM) takes over, focusing on features and functionality of EAM software. It also compares CMMS and EAM software and explores the two key differentiators.
|
| 4. |
EAM Showdown! IFS vs. Mincom vs. CHAMPS ( Pages)
by Sadat Zaman
Apr 27, 2007 Abstract : Using our EAM Evaluation Center, we compared Mincom Ellipse, CHAMPS, and IFS head-on. For the overall rankings, we looked at the vendors in two basic configurations: with back-office (HR and financials) functionality, for a total of eight main modules, and without, for a total of six main modules. To eliminate any chance of bias, and to ensure a level playing field, all 3,146 criteria comprising the modules and submodules in the EAM request for information (RFI) were given equal weight and priority.
|
| 5. |
EAM Versus CMMS: What's Right for Your Company? Part One ( Pages)
by Joe Strub and P.J. Jakovljevic
Mar 15, 2004 Abstract : As companies continue to look for more areas from which to squeeze out revenues and reduce expenses, enterprise asset management (EAM) and computerized maintenance management systems (CMMS) software continue to receive good press as the systems providing an answer--and with justification. But what software makes the most sense for your company and from which providers--EAM/CMMS best-of-breed incumbents or enterprise resource planning (ERP)
|
| 6. |
The Total EAM Vision Strategic Advantages in Asset Management ( Pages)
by Daryl Mather
Jun 27, 2003 Abstract : Physical asset management contributes greatly to the achievement of competitive advantages in capital intensive companies. Particularly in the areas of productivity, quality, cost effectiveness, and risk management. If your company has a need to manage physical assets it can benefit from a proven Total EAM solution provided by one of the top-level systems vendors.
|
| 7. |
EAM versus CMMS: What's Right for Your Company? Part Four: IFS and Intentia Responses ( Pages)
by Joe Strub and P.J. Jakovljevic
Mar 18, 2004 Abstract : The primary benefit of enterprise asset management (EAM) is the reliability-centered maintenance. Let’s face it: any process that can help you improve what you are doing now and enables you to do it better in the future is the best thing since
|
| 8. |
EAM versus CMMS: What's Right for Your Company? Part Two: Integration Concerns ( Pages)
by Joe Strub and P.J. Jakovljevic
Mar 16, 2004 Abstract : In most cases, companies will acquire enterprise asset management (EAM) software but the interfaces to external systems will have to be constructed.
|
| 9. |
Captured by Data ( Pages)
by Daryl Mather
Aug 23, 2006 Abstract : The benefits case for enterprise asset management (EAM) has been used to justify huge sums in EAM investment. But to understand this reasoning, it is necessary to explore how asset data can be used to further the aims of maintenance.
|
| 10. |
Best of Breed Versus Fully Integrated Software: The Pro's and Con's ( Pages)
by Joseph J. Strub
Aug 8, 2003 Abstract : After dealing with the over-hype of Y2K, companies have started to reconsider the best of breed as a viable solution to satisfy their software needs. This comes as a shock to the corporate systems culture when user communities were told that fully integrated software such as ERP, SCM, and EAM were the only way to meet their software needs. After developing a level playing field, this article examines the pro’s and con’s of one alternative over the other. Read on to see if you agree with the merits of the best of breed or fully integrated software approach to software selection.
|