| 1. |
Pull vs Push: a Discussion of Lean, JIT, Flow, and Traditional MRP Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations ( Pages)
by P.J. Jakovljevic
Jan 15, 2004
Abstract : While lean/flow leverages practices to stay ahead of actual demand, traditional approaches better coordinate secondary, back-office systems like accounting and HR. Moreover, flow should be a company-wide strategy that impacts more than manufacturing.
|
| 2. |
Cash Management 101 ( Pages)
by Leslie Satenstein
Aug 13, 2008
Abstract : Cash management is an essential business process all organizations must perform to survive. Though cash management uses automation for much of the “grunt” work, it is human intelligence in the financial decision making that does the rest.
|
| 3. |
Pull vs Push: a Discussion of Lean, JIT, Flow, and Traditional MRP Part 1: Tutorial ( Pages)
by P.J. Jakovljevic
Jan 14, 2004
Abstract : Flow manufacturing leverages techniques to help manufacturers create any product on any given day, in any given quantity including the
|
| 4. |
QAD Ends Its Protracted Dry Season, Not Yet On an Easy Street ( Pages)
by P.J. Jakovljevic
Apr 11, 2000
Abstract : QAD Inc. reported $0.06 of diluted net income per share, or net income of $2.1 million, on record total revenue of $70.9 million for the fourth fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2000. This compares with $0.16 of diluted net loss per share or a net loss of $4.9 million on total revenue of $65.4 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999.
|
| 5. |
Managing Global Trade Flows ( Pages)
by P.J. Jakovljevic
Jun 16, 2005
Abstract : In global trade, the flow of information must support the tracking and management of the goods to enable the secure and compliant entry and exit to and from countries for the correct funds to flow to eligible business and trading partners.
|
| 6. |
Interview with Jeff Bates of SourceForge.net, Slashdot, and the OSTG ( Pages)
by Josh Chalifour
Jul 26, 2005
Abstract : Jeff Bates's experience in developing and managing SourceForge.net and Slashdot communities sheds light on encouraging the interest of participants in the open source community. He discusses important technology considerations toward aiding distributed software development efforts.
|
| 7. |
Epicor Claims The Forefront Of CRM.NET-ification Part 1 ( Pages)
by P.J. Jakovljevic
Jun 11, 2002
Abstract : By harnessing .NET possibly more zealously than its creator Microsoft’s Great Plains and Navision enterprise counterparts, and while difficult market conditions continue to persist, Epicor might be showing us that ‘a brave heart and wise mind’ can keep it in the mid-market leadership race amongst aslew of formidable opponents.
|
| 8. |
Sun’s Java Won’t Be In Microsoft’s .NET – Complicate Your Integration? You .BET ( Pages)
by M. Reed
Feb 19, 2001
Abstract : Sun and Microsoft have announced a settlement in Sun’s lawsuit regarding Microsoft’s use of Java technology. Microsoft was given the choice of conforming to the Java standard or opting out and they chose to opt out. Under terms of the agreement Microsoft cannot use Java in their forthcoming .NET initiative. Of course both vendors claim victory, but inevitably it will be the customer who loses.
|
| 9. |
Understand J2EE and .NET Environments Before You Choose ( Pages)
by P.J. Jakovljevic
Dec 8, 2004
Abstract : The Microsoft .NET versus J2EE platform argument often takes on the vehemence of a religious debate. Choosing one may amount to
|
CART 
